From c088b2d904445f501c5aa7a6fc63ca9e8b96f224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ellenberg Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:57:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drbd: don't pretend that barrier_nr == 0 was special We used to have a barrier implementation where barrier_nr 0 was reserved. That is long gone. Just use the full sequence space. Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c index 02fd1e109cf..519f286a429 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c @@ -247,9 +247,7 @@ void _tl_add_barrier(struct drbd_conf *mdev, struct drbd_tl_epoch *new) new->n_writes = 0; newest_before = mdev->newest_tle; - /* never send a barrier number == 0, because that is special-cased - * when using TCQ for our write ordering code */ - new->br_number = (newest_before->br_number+1) ?: 1; + new->br_number = newest_before->br_number+1; if (mdev->newest_tle != new) { mdev->newest_tle->next = new; mdev->newest_tle = new; -- 2.46.0