From 91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:56:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Fix recursive user stack trace The user stack trace can fault when examining the trace. Which would call the do_page_fault handler, which would trace again, which would do the user stack trace, which would fault and call do_page_fault again ... Thus this is causing a recursive bug. We need to have a recursion detector here. [ Resubmitted by Jiri Olsa ] [ Eric Dumazet recommended using __this_cpu_* instead of __get_cpu_* ] Cc: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa LKML-Reference: <1289390172-9730-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 82d9b8106cd..ee6a7339cf0 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1284,6 +1284,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void) __ftrace_trace_stack(global_trace.buffer, flags, 3, preempt_count()); } +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count); + void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc) { @@ -1302,6 +1304,18 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc) if (unlikely(in_nmi())) return; + /* + * prevent recursion, since the user stack tracing may + * trigger other kernel events. + */ + preempt_disable(); + if (__this_cpu_read(user_stack_count)) + goto out; + + __this_cpu_inc(user_stack_count); + + + event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_USER_STACK, sizeof(*entry), flags, pc); if (!event) @@ -1319,6 +1333,11 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc) save_stack_trace_user(&trace); if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event)) ring_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event); + + __this_cpu_dec(user_stack_count); + + out: + preempt_enable(); } #ifdef UNUSED -- 2.46.0