From 8968dab8ad90ea16ef92f2406868354ea3ab6bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:11:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() numa_emulation() called compute_hash_shift() with %NULL @nodeids which meant identity mapping between index and nodeid. Make numa_emulation() build identity array and drop %NULL @nodeids handling from populate_memnodemap() and thus from compute_hash_shift(). This is to prepare for transition to using memblks instead. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Shaohui Zheng Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index e211c005f5e..243d18d4cfd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -63,12 +63,7 @@ static int __init populate_memnodemap(const struct bootnode *nodes, do { if (memnodemap[addr >> shift] != NUMA_NO_NODE) return -1; - - if (!nodeids) - memnodemap[addr >> shift] = i; - else - memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i]; - + memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i]; addr += (1UL << shift); } while (addr < end); res = 1; @@ -706,6 +701,7 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(u64 addr, u64 max_addr, u64 size) static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd) { + static int nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata; u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; int num_nodes; @@ -730,7 +726,11 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn, if (num_nodes < 0) return num_nodes; - memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, NULL); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nodeid); i++) + nodeid[i] = i; + + memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, nodeid); if (memnode_shift < 0) { memnode_shift = 0; printk(KERN_ERR "No NUMA hash function found. NUMA emulation " -- 2.41.0