From 7ecc45e3ef8468abb062be2a8bb427029342f42d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:33:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: add error handling to fence_wait_empty_locked MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Instead of returning the error handle it directly and while at it fix the comments about the ring lock. Signed-off-by: Christian König Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h index 77b4519b19b..5861ec86725 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring); bool radeon_fence_signaled(struct radeon_fence *fence); int radeon_fence_wait(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool interruptible); int radeon_fence_wait_next_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring); -int radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring); +void radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring); int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence **fences, bool intr); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c index 7b55625a5e1..be4e4f390e8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c @@ -440,14 +440,11 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev, return 0; } +/* caller must hold ring lock */ int radeon_fence_wait_next_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq; - /* We are not protected by ring lock when reading current seq but - * it's ok as worst case is we return to early while we could have - * wait. - */ seq = atomic64_read(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq) + 1ULL; if (seq >= rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring]) { /* nothing to wait for, last_seq is @@ -457,15 +454,27 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) return radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, ring, false, false); } -int radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) +/* caller must hold ring lock */ +void radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { - /* We are not protected by ring lock when reading current seq - * but it's ok as wait empty is call from place where no more - * activity can be scheduled so there won't be concurrent access - * to seq value. - */ - return radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring], - ring, false, false); + uint64_t seq = rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring]; + + while(1) { + int r; + r = radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, ring, false, false); + if (r == -EDEADLK) { + mutex_unlock(&rdev->ring_lock); + r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev); + mutex_lock(&rdev->ring_lock); + if (!r) + continue; + } + if (r) { + dev_err(rdev->dev, "error waiting for ring to become" + " idle (%d)\n", r); + } + return; + } } struct radeon_fence *radeon_fence_ref(struct radeon_fence *fence) -- 2.46.0