From 70369b117a8fc5ac18a635ced23ee49f8e722e7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:40:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: use cwq_set_max_active() helper for workqueue_set_max_active() workqueue_set_max_active() may increase ->max_active without activating delayed works and may make the activation order differ from the queueing order. Both aren't strictly bugs but the resulting behavior could be a bit odd. To make things more consistent, use cwq_set_max_active() helper which immediately makes use of the newly increased max_mactive if there are delayed work items and also keeps the activation order. tj: Slight update to description. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index b5d722548ff..4f5c61f8b0e 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3413,7 +3413,7 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active) if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) || !(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING)) - get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq)->max_active = max_active; + cwq_set_max_active(get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq), max_active); spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock); } -- 2.46.0