From 1331e7a1bbe1f11b19c4327ba0853bee2a606543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:43:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Remove _rcu_barrier() dependency on __stop_machine() Currently, _rcu_barrier() relies on preempt_disable() to prevent any CPU from going offline, which in turn depends on CPU hotplug's use of __stop_machine(). This patch therefore makes _rcu_barrier() use get_online_cpus() to block CPU-hotplug operations. This has the added benefit of removing the need for _rcu_barrier() to adopt callbacks: Because CPU-hotplug operations are excluded, there can be no callbacks to adopt. This commit simplifies the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcutree.c | 83 ++++++------------------------------------ kernel/rcutree.h | 3 -- kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 4 +- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index f7bcd9e6c05..c45d3f74530 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -1392,17 +1392,6 @@ static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp) int i; struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); - /* - * If there is an rcu_barrier() operation in progress, then - * only the task doing that operation is permitted to adopt - * callbacks. To do otherwise breaks rcu_barrier() and friends - * by causing them to fail to wait for the callbacks in the - * orphanage. - */ - if (rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress && - rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress != current) - return; - /* Do the accounting first. */ rdp->qlen_lazy += rsp->qlen_lazy; rdp->qlen += rsp->qlen; @@ -1457,9 +1446,8 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting * this fact from process context. Do the remainder of the cleanup, * including orphaning the outgoing CPU's RCU callbacks, and also - * adopting them, if there is no _rcu_barrier() instance running. - * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no other - * CPU can be attempting to update rcu_cpu_kthread_task. + * adopting them. There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, + * so no other CPU can be attempting to update rcu_cpu_kthread_task. */ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) { @@ -1521,10 +1509,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ -static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp) -{ -} - static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) { } @@ -2328,13 +2312,10 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type) static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp) { int cpu; - unsigned long flags; struct rcu_data *rdp; - struct rcu_data rd; unsigned long snap = ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done); unsigned long snap_done; - init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rd.barrier_head); _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, snap); /* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */ @@ -2374,70 +2355,30 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp) /* * Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to * avoid a too-soon return to zero in case of a short grace period - * (or preemption of this task). Also flag this task as doing - * an rcu_barrier(). This will prevent anyone else from adopting - * orphaned callbacks, which could cause otherwise failure if a - * CPU went offline and quickly came back online. To see this, - * consider the following sequence of events: - * - * 1. We cause CPU 0 to post an rcu_barrier_callback() callback. - * 2. CPU 1 goes offline, orphaning its callbacks. - * 3. CPU 0 adopts CPU 1's orphaned callbacks. - * 4. CPU 1 comes back online. - * 5. We cause CPU 1 to post an rcu_barrier_callback() callback. - * 6. Both rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks are invoked, awakening - * us -- but before CPU 1's orphaned callbacks are invoked!!! + * (or preemption of this task). Exclude CPU-hotplug operations + * to ensure that no offline CPU has callbacks queued. */ init_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion); atomic_set(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count, 1); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); - rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = current; - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + get_online_cpus(); /* - * Force every CPU with callbacks to register a new callback - * that will tell us when all the preceding callbacks have - * been invoked. If an offline CPU has callbacks, wait for - * it to either come back online or to finish orphaning those - * callbacks. + * Force each CPU with callbacks to register a new callback. + * When that callback is invoked, we will know that all of the + * corresponding CPU's preceding callbacks have been invoked. */ - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - preempt_disable(); + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu); - if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) { - _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Offline", cpu, - rsp->n_barrier_done); - preempt_enable(); - while (cpu_is_offline(cpu) && ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) - schedule_timeout_interruptible(1); - } else if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) { + if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) { _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineQ", cpu, rsp->n_barrier_done); smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1); - preempt_enable(); } else { _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNQ", cpu, rsp->n_barrier_done); - preempt_enable(); } } - - /* - * Now that all online CPUs have rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks - * posted, we can adopt all of the orphaned callbacks and place - * an rcu_barrier_callback() callback after them. When that is done, - * we are guaranteed to have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback - * following every callback that could possibly have been - * registered before _rcu_barrier() was called. - */ - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); - rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp); - rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = NULL; - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); - atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count); - smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Ensure atomic_inc() before callback. */ - rd.rsp = rsp; - rsp->call(&rd.barrier_head, rcu_barrier_callback); + put_online_cpus(); /* * Now that we have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback on each @@ -2458,8 +2399,6 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp) /* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */ mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex); - - destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rd.barrier_head); } /** diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h index 4d29169f212..94dfdf1f31f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h @@ -398,9 +398,6 @@ struct rcu_state { struct rcu_head **orphan_donetail; /* Tail of above. */ long qlen_lazy; /* Number of lazy callbacks. */ long qlen; /* Total number of callbacks. */ - struct task_struct *rcu_barrier_in_progress; - /* Task doing rcu_barrier(), */ - /* or NULL if no barrier. */ struct mutex barrier_mutex; /* Guards barrier fields. */ atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */ struct completion barrier_completion; /* Wake at barrier end. */ diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c index abffb486e94..6a2e52a85d7 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) struct rcu_state *rsp; for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) - seq_printf(m, "%s: %c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n", - rsp->name, rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.', + seq_printf(m, "%s: bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n", + rsp->name, atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count), rsp->n_barrier_done); return 0; -- 2.46.0