From: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:39:20 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/i915: adjusted_mode->clock in the dp mode_fixup X-Git-Url: https://openfabrics.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=71244653a8fb0f46bc12ae421f1d5f72af6a75da;p=~shefty%2Frdma-dev.git drm/i915: adjusted_mode->clock in the dp mode_fixup ... instead of changing mode->clock, which we should leave as-is. After the previous patch we only touch that if it's a panel, and then adjusted mode->clock equals adjusted_mode->clock. Outside of intel_dp.c we only use ajusted_mode->clock in the mode_set functions. Within intel_dp.c we only use it to calculate the dp dithering and link bw parameters, so that's the only thing we need to fix up. As a temporary ugliness (until the cleanup in the next patch) we pass the adjusted_mode into dp_dither for both parameters (because that one still looks at mode->clock). Note that we do overwrite adjusted_mode->clock with the selected dp link clock, but that only happens after we've calculated everything we need based on the dotclock of the adjusted output configuration. Outside of intel_dp.c only intel_display.c uses adjusted_mode->clock, and that stays the same after this patch (still equals the selected dp link clock). intel_display.c also needs the actual dotclock (as target_clock), but that has been fixed up in the previous patch. v2: Adjust the debug message to also use adjusted_mode->clock. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index ae7c6234012..90cb39e89e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -710,11 +710,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_display_mode *mode, intel_fixed_panel_mode(intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode, adjusted_mode); intel_pch_panel_fitting(dev, DRM_MODE_SCALE_FULLSCREEN, mode, adjusted_mode); - /* - * the mode->clock is used to calculate the Data&Link M/N - * of the pipe. For the eDP the fixed clock should be used. - */ - mode->clock = intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode->clock; } if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK) @@ -722,13 +717,13 @@ intel_dp_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_display_mode *mode, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i " "max bw %02x pixel clock %iKHz\n", - max_lane_count, bws[max_clock], mode->clock); + max_lane_count, bws[max_clock], adjusted_mode->clock); - if (!intel_dp_adjust_dithering(intel_dp, mode, adjusted_mode)) + if (!intel_dp_adjust_dithering(intel_dp, adjusted_mode, adjusted_mode)) return false; bpp = adjusted_mode->private_flags & INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC ? 18 : 24; - mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(mode->clock, bpp); + mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(adjusted_mode->clock, bpp); for (lane_count = 1; lane_count <= max_lane_count; lane_count <<= 1) { for (clock = 0; clock <= max_clock; clock++) {