Version: 1
-Previous: baf776eef39ea310fb8342714a905eb52ce4c391
-Head: 24590bc96d8871d80124d68d182c915d7efcc9e6
+Previous: 38105957fc85c170b5dc54de2605c43576cf5533
+Head: ec95b68d2f42848875e552c256a61a635ecd62b9
Applied:
+ xfer-cnt: ec95b68d2f42848875e552c256a61a635ecd62b9
Unapplied:
af-ib-conn: cf7b9e73d471477d4c7dff2592e5b0d3a7dea8ae
addrtype: 23a84fed89ba3f6b0eb63e5f8b37c0df504d0d3e
--- /dev/null
+Bottom: 2737e70c64c9617bb741fff20192947019c4f7d9
+Top: 2737e70c64c9617bb741fff20192947019c4f7d9
+Author: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
+Date: 2013-03-05 13:39:00 -0800
+
+librdmacm/rstream: Adjust transfer counts
+
+A customer has reported that 100 transfers for large sizes
+is insufficient to achieve the top bandwidth over a high
+latency link. Contrary, 100,000 transfers is too high for
+small latency ping-pong over a slow connection.
+
+Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
+
+
+---
+
+